To the parents of these awesome kids - kudos for raising such conscientious, caring and open-minded children. Nice to see a bit of positivity after the past few days!
Even if I knew that tomorrow the world would go to pieces, I would still plant my apple tree. - Martin Luther
Showing posts with label equality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label equality. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 16, 2013
Parenting - you're doing it right
Love this! All the kids are awesome, but there is something about the little freckled girl in the turquoise dress that I just love.
To the parents of these awesome kids - kudos for raising such conscientious, caring and open-minded children. Nice to see a bit of positivity after the past few days!
To the parents of these awesome kids - kudos for raising such conscientious, caring and open-minded children. Nice to see a bit of positivity after the past few days!
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Dear fellow human beings...
Dear fellow human beings,
Yes, I know I am fat.
No, it is not necessary to point this out to me or make snide and
condescending comments as I pass by – I’m fat, not deaf. I don’t ask for any special privileges or do
anything to hurt you (besides exist in your world). If you could just treat me like a fellow
human being who has feelings, that would be great – I don’t think that’s too
much to ask.
Much obliged,
Fat chick
P.S. Yes, I know it
is unhealthy to be fat. Yes, I am trying to do something about it and am making
slow and steady progress. Please note,
however, that every time someone decides to verbally (or visually) show how
much my existence disgusts them it just makes the process even harder as an
emotional eater. So congratulations, you
just could have contributed to my being fat even longer (except you won’t
because I won’t let you have that power over me.) So there.
4/9 - Due to the necessity of some people to be complete jerks (all the more proving my point) I have disabled comments on this entry. People have a right to their option, ie. this post was because "I have a desperate need for attention"... (um, hello - the whole point of this is that I don't want the extra attention!) however the main reason for even writing this post in the first place was simply to be a voice for the other people out there like me who are treated like lesser class citizens just because of how we look and either are afraid to speak up (and who could blame them?) or don't have a medium to do so in. End of story.
4/9 - Due to the necessity of some people to be complete jerks (all the more proving my point) I have disabled comments on this entry. People have a right to their option, ie. this post was because "I have a desperate need for attention"... (um, hello - the whole point of this is that I don't want the extra attention!) however the main reason for even writing this post in the first place was simply to be a voice for the other people out there like me who are treated like lesser class citizens just because of how we look and either are afraid to speak up (and who could blame them?) or don't have a medium to do so in. End of story.
Labels:
addiction,
challenges,
equality,
fat
Saturday, November 3, 2012
Equality?
There are some excellent points here.
While I realize there will always be some who cannot and will not ever accept the LGBT community as complete equals (cause if you deny them marriage you deny them equality, plain and simple) there will also be those of us who will always, no matter how much you quote the very few words from the Bible about the subject to state your case, support equal (or in this case, gay) rights.
I do not feel that my personal relationship with Christ is threatened by someone loving another of the same sex. Nor do I feel that the future of the "traditional family" is at risk because we allow two men or two women to enter a committed relationship with each other, protected by the same laws that protect straight couples.
I can support the idea of changing the legal term of "marriage" into "civil union" for all people, straight and gay alike - the civil union term would refer to their law bound rights and, if they are a believer in the religious sacrament of marriage, then a "marriage certificate" would be issued by their religious organization of choice. It would be a choice of the religious institution to offer the option of marriage certificates to just heterosexual couples or, if they are accepting of the gay community, they can choose to extend this to homosexual couples as well.
This would not take away from the sanctity of marriage, in fact it would increase it because the term would only be used by those who believe in the religious aspect of the commitment versus being used as a blanket term to essentially mean a civil union.
Well, these are my thoughts on the matter - you are free to disagree (or agree!) as you choose. If you choose to comment, my only request is that you are thoughtful in your reply and that you be polite. :)
While I realize there will always be some who cannot and will not ever accept the LGBT community as complete equals (cause if you deny them marriage you deny them equality, plain and simple) there will also be those of us who will always, no matter how much you quote the very few words from the Bible about the subject to state your case, support equal (or in this case, gay) rights.
I do not feel that my personal relationship with Christ is threatened by someone loving another of the same sex. Nor do I feel that the future of the "traditional family" is at risk because we allow two men or two women to enter a committed relationship with each other, protected by the same laws that protect straight couples.
I can support the idea of changing the legal term of "marriage" into "civil union" for all people, straight and gay alike - the civil union term would refer to their law bound rights and, if they are a believer in the religious sacrament of marriage, then a "marriage certificate" would be issued by their religious organization of choice. It would be a choice of the religious institution to offer the option of marriage certificates to just heterosexual couples or, if they are accepting of the gay community, they can choose to extend this to homosexual couples as well.
This would not take away from the sanctity of marriage, in fact it would increase it because the term would only be used by those who believe in the religious aspect of the commitment versus being used as a blanket term to essentially mean a civil union.
Well, these are my thoughts on the matter - you are free to disagree (or agree!) as you choose. If you choose to comment, my only request is that you are thoughtful in your reply and that you be polite. :)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)